For those of you who unfortunately went to, or
are going to government schools, here's a bit of history for you...
The United Nations rose from the ashes of the
League of Nations (which, ironically, was accused of being grossely
ineffective in dealing with assholes like Adolf Hitler). At the end
of World War II, the victorious Allied forces decided it would be a good
idea to create a new international body, whose job would be to intervene
and prevent future wars between nations. Sounds good, doesn't it?
Kind of a "global mediator," so to speak. An impartial judge to help
facilitate peace. It almost makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.
However, something happened since October of
1945. The United Nations, like most governmental and
pseudo-governmental bodies, morphed into something that it didn't intend
to become. It's become a weak and ineffective joke of an
organization.
An organization that the United States needs
to break ties with.
Oh, but why, dear Web-Tyrant? Why are
you picking on such a wonderful, global body of pseudo-government?
The United States needs the U.N. We need
to have good diplomatic relations with them!
Well, that's a typical opinion...if you're a
Commucrat.
Let's look at few of the "good" things the
United Nations has done.
1) Humanitarian Aid
According to the United Nations, one of its
primary goals is to provide humanitarian aid, and international
development. It created the World Health Organization, which
successfully found a vaccine for smallpox, in 1977. It created the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) which is basically a massive "Robin
Hood" enterprise. Rich countries pay into a pool, and then that
money is redistributed to poorer countries (a Commucratic dream). It
also created the World Food Council to distribute food to starving
nations.
2) Peacekeeping
According to the United Nations, it was
they who kept the Cold War "cold," Uh...uh....well...that's all
they've done in this department.
3) Human rights
They created the "Universal Declaration of
Human Rights." But...uh....according to the UN, it's not "legally
binding."
4) Treaties and International Law
The UN LOVES to pimp their
"International Court of Justice." This is supposed to be the
end-all, be-all world court. But as Adolf Hitler once wrote, "What's
a treaty, but a piece of paper?"
But now, let's take a look at some of the
"bad" things that the United Nations is responsible for. We'll use
the same points...
1) Humanitarian Aid
In 1994, the United Nations failed to prevent
the Rwandan genocide, which resulted in the killings of nearly a million
people, due to the refusal of the security council members to approve any
necessary military action.
The United Nations failed to successfully
deliver food to starving people in Somalia. The food was instead,
easiliy seized by local warlords. A U.S./UN attempt to apprehend the
warlords seizing these shipments resulted in the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu.
We all know how that one went.
Sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers. Numerous
incidents of sexually abused and exploited girls, as young as 8, in a
number of different peacekeeping missions. This abuse has become
widespread and ongoing despite UN attempts to stop it.
Remember the World Food Council, I wrote about
a few paragraphs ago? It was disbanded in 1993.
2) Peacekeeping
USSR vs. Afghanistan. North Korea vs.
South Korea. The Vietnam War (and the regular resupply of North
Vietnamese forces by the USSR and Communist China). Iraq vs. Iran.
Iraq vs. Kuwait.
Basically, when it comes to some pissant
little 4th-World country, the UN is all over it. Otherwise, it would
rather just be a bystander.